In physics learning that emphasizes a student-centered approach, formative feedback strategically improves students’ conceptual understanding and learning motivation. However, implementing feedback in the learning environment still faces various obstacles, including time constraints, many students, and a lack of personalization in its delivery. Previous studies generally focus on developing media or feedback delivery models but pay little attention to analyzing student needs as a basis for system design. This study offers anovel contribution by examining students’ needs for computer-based formative feedback in physics learning as a basis for developing a contextual and adaptive system. The main objectives of this study are to identify the interests and needs of students and teachers concerning the application of computer-assisted formative feedback, particularly in physics learning. This study used a descriptive survey method with a quantitative and qualitative approach, involving 104 high school students and 30 physics teachers in East Java Province. The research instruments comprised a Likert scale questionnaire and open-ended questions that experts had validated. The results showed that students and teachers agreed that digital feedback could improve conceptual understanding and motivation. However, there is still a gap in perception regarding the level of student independence in accessing and utilizing the feedback. Students tend to choose a simple multiple-choice test model, while teachers prefer an isomorphic test model with high diagnostic power. The type of feedback considered most effective by students and teachers is the interactive and video-based feedback model because it is considered more interesting, easy to understand, and positively impacts the learning process. This study contributes to developing a computer-based feedback system more responsive to user needs and encourages teachers to integrate digital media into physics learning practices more effectively and adaptively
Irawan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: