Review proposes a Dual-Pathway Framework to enhance cancer diagnostics through organismal behavior and machine learning.
Organismal biosensing leverages the olfactory acuity of living systems to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with cancer, offering a low-cost and non-invasive complement to conventional diagnostics. Early studies demonstrate its feasibility across diverse platforms. In C. elegans, chemotaxis assays on urine samples achieved sensitivities of 87–96% and specificities of 90–95% in case–control cohorts (n up to 242), while calcium imaging of AWC neurons distinguished breast cancer urine with ~97% accuracy in a small pilot cohort (n ≈ 40). Trained canines have identified prostate cancer from urine with sensitivities of ~71% and specificities of 70–76% (n ≈ 50), and AI-augmented canine breath platforms have reported accuracies of ~94–95% across ~1400 participants. Insects such as locusts and honeybees enable ultrafast neural decoding of VOCs, achieving 82–100% classification accuracy within 250 ms in pilot studies (n ≈ 20–30). Collectively, these platforms validate the principle that organismal behavior and neural activity encode cancer-related VOC signatures. However, limitations remain, including small cohorts, methodological heterogeneity, and reliance on binary outputs. This review proposes a Dual-Pathway Framework, where Pathway 1 leverages validated indices (e.g., the Chemotaxis Index) for high-throughput screening, and Pathway 2 applies machine learning to high-dimensional behavioral vectors for cancer subtyping, staging, and monitoring. By integrating these approaches, organismal biosensing could evolve from proof-of-concept assays into clinically scalable precision diagnostics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alshammari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: