This analysis finds improved filtration efficiency and reduced pressure drop for diesel particulate filters, suggesting a balance in design is achievable.
The diesel particulate filter (DPF) is among the most effective measures for controlling particulate emissions from diesel vehicles. Therefore, resource-efficient DPF design and operation are critical to sustainable deployment. In practical engineering, the pursuit of high filtration efficiency inevitably leads to excessively high pressure drop, which in turn impairs the fuel economy and operational reliability of the engine. To address this pair of conflicting objectives, this study introduces a hybrid GRA-MLR-WOA approach, with the initial filtration efficiency and pressure drop at an 80 g soot capture amount as the optimization objectives, to optimize the structural parameters of the DPF. Firstly, based on a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model and orthogonal experimental design, combined with grey relational analysis (GRA), the effects of key structural parameters on filtration efficiency and pressure drop were evaluated. Secondly, Box–Behnken Design (BBD) was integrated with multiple linear regression (MLR) to establish mathematical regression models describing the relationships between structural parameters, filtration efficiency, and pressure drop. Finally, the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was employed to obtain the Pareto frontier of the regression models. Through screening with the goal of maximizing initial filtration efficiency, the optimized DPF achieved a 46.85% increase in initial filtration efficiency and a 34.88% reduction in pressure drop compared to the original model. This study targets sustainable filtration design and proposes an optimization framework that jointly optimizes pressure drop and the initial filtration efficiency. The results provide a robust empirical basis for engineering practice and demonstrate strong reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: