Retrospective analysis compares biopsy and surgical pathology outcomes in patients with various cervical lesions, indicating diagnostic differences.
Aim: To compare cervical biopsy diagnoses with final surgical pathology results among patients with SMILE, CIN3, and AIS, and to evaluate differences in clinical-pathological features between these lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of patients diagnosed with SMILE (n=8), CIN3 (n=16), or AIS (n=14) who underwent surgical treatment. Clinical variables, high-risk HPV genotypes, cervical cytology findings, treatment modality, and pathological outcomes of surgical specimens were reviewed. Results: The distribution of HPV high-risk genotypes and cytologic diagnoses were similar between the groups (p>0.05). The rate of hysterectomy performed during initial treatment or after reoperation was higher in patients with AIS compared to the other groups. The concordance between the preliminary biopsy diagnosis and the pathological diagnosis after surgical excision differed significantly across lesion types (p
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sözen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: