Simulation reveals that slotted explosion-proof enclosures improve magnetic flux coupling and efficiency.
To meet safety regulations in underground coal mines, wireless power transfer (WPT) systems must house both the transmitter and receiver within explosion-proof enclosures. However, eddy currents induced on the surfaces of these non-ferromagnetic metal enclosures significantly hinder magnetic flux coupling, thereby reducing transmission efficiency. This paper proposes a slotting technique applied to explosion-proof enclosures to suppress eddy currents, along with the integration of magnetic flux focusing materials into the coils to enhance coupling. Simulations were conducted to compare three system configurations: (i) a WPT system without enclosures, (ii) a system with solid (unslotted) enclosures, and (iii) a system with slotted enclosures. The results show that solid enclosures reduce efficiency to nearly zero, whereas slotted enclosures restore efficiency to 90% of the baseline system without enclosures. Joule heating remains low in the slotted explosion-proof enclosures, with energy losses of 2.552 J for the transmitter enclosure and 2.578 J for the receiver enclosure. A conservative first-order estimation confirms that the corresponding temperature rise in the enclosure surfaces remains below 50 °C, which is well within the 150 °C limit stipulated by the Chinese National Standard GB 3836.1-2021 (Explosive Atmospheres—Part 1: Equipment General Requirements). These findings confirm effective eddy current suppression and efficiency recovery without compromising explosion-proof safety. The core innovation of this work lies not merely in the physical slotting approach, but in the development of a precise equivalent circuit model that fully incorporates all mutual inductance components representing eddy current effects in non-ferromagnetic explosion-proof enclosures, and its integration into the overall MCR-WPT system circuit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: