This analysis calculates molecular structures and thermodynamic properties of tetraazaporphin variants, highlighting significant stability differences.
Using two variants of DFT model chemistries, specifically M06/def2TZVP and B3PW91/TZVP combined with D3 Grimme dispersion, the molecular structures of hydrogenated porphyrazine and its octafluoro-substituted derivatives, namely (22H,24H)-5,10,15,20-tetraazaporphin and perfluoro-(22H,24H)-5,10,15,20-tetraazaporphin, were calculated. The key bond lengths, valence and non-bonded angles in these compounds, along with NBO analysis data, are presented. It is observed that each of these compounds features groups of four nitrogen atoms that are strictly planar; additionally, the four nitrogen atoms not bonded to hydrogen are positioned at the vertices of a square, while those forming N–H bonds are at the vertices of a rhombus. The 16-membered macrocycles in all these compounds are non-planar, although their deviation from coplanarity generally does not exceed [Formula: see text]. According to NBO analysis, there is a high degree of electron density delocalization within these compounds. The standard enthalpy of formation ([Formula: see text], standard entropy ([Formula: see text], and standard Gibbs free energy ([Formula: see text] were also calculated. It was found that in perfluoro-(22H,24H)-5,10,15,20-tetraazaporphin, unlike (22H,24H)-5,10,15,20-tetraazaporphin, the values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are negative, indicating significantly greater thermodynamic stability compared to (22H,24H)porphyrazine. Good agreement was noted between the data derived from the two DFT model chemistry methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Чачков et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: