This analysis demonstrates a novel dual-frequency method for assessing shield damage in power cables, suggesting improved defect evaluation.
Cable shields may develop holes when the sheath is damaged. Time–frequency domain reflectometry (TFDR) is an effective method for detecting cable defects, but it cannot directly evaluate hole sizes. To address this issue, we analyze the impact of shield hole sizes on TFDR signals. Building on this analysis, we propose an improved dual-frequency TFDR method to measure shield holes and evaluate their sizes. This method directly measures the characteristic impedances and damage ratios using dual-frequency TFDR, followed by a two-step evaluation process to determine the hole center angles and lengths based on these measurements. Simulations and experiments validate the proposed method. In laboratory-scale experiments using a scaled cable model, and considering measurement noise, the maximum relative errors for shield hole length and center angle are 11% and 5%, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Energies