This study aimed to critically evaluate the fairness of mandatory retirement policies under South African law and compare them with the legal frameworks in the United States (USA) and Canada, where retirement age dismissals are approached differently. This desktop study used a comparative legal research methodology to analyze statutory provisions, case law, and academic scholarship to evaluate the protections against age-based dismissals in these jurisdictions. According to the findings, South African labour law permits retirement age dismissals if appropriate; they may still be contested as automatically unfair under the Labour Relations Act if they lack a legitimate rationale. In contrast, the USA and Canada impose stricter anti-discrimination measures, making mandatory retirement more difficult to enforce. The study recommends reforms to South African retirement laws to align more closely with international best practices, ensuring greater protection for older workers. This research contributes to the discourse on labour rights and age discrimination, offering insights for policymakers, employers, and legal practitioners on balancing retirement policies with fundamental employment protections. Keywords: Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Retirement Age, Age Discrimination, Comparative Labor Law
Ntsika Qakaza (Mon,) studied this question.