This analysis reveals the impact of group proportion imbalance on fairness, suggesting new sampling methods in user modeling.
User modeling serves as a crucial foundation for researchers to capture useful potential characteristics, playing a pivotal role in various applications such as recommender systems. One common challenge in user modeling is the cold-start problem, where interactions are notably limited for new users. To tackle this issue, the paradigm of meta-learning has been introduced to user modeling, yielding promising results. Similar to a guidebook for a new traveler, meta-learning significantly influences decision-making for new users in critical scenarios, such as career recommendations. Consequently, the issue of fairness in meta-learning has become paramount. Several methods have been proposed to mitigate unfairness in meta-learning and have shown promising results. However, a fundamental question remains unexplored: What is the critical factor leading to unfairness in meta-learned user modeling? Through theoretical analysis that integrates the meta-learning paradigm with group fairness metrics, we identify group proportion imbalance as a critical factor. Subsequently, another question arises: How can we mitigate the influence of this factor to enhance fairness while ensuring accuracy? To this end, we introduce a novel F airness-aware A daptive S ampling framework for me T a-learning, abbreviated as FAST. Its core concept involves adaptively adjusting the sampling distribution for different user groups during the interleaved training process of meta-learning. Moreover, we provide theoretical guarantees demonstrating the convergence of FAST, showcasing its potential to effectively eliminate unfairness. Furthermore, to ensure model accuracy, we enhance FAST with FAST+ by introducing a hybrid sampling strategy at an individual level. This strategy prioritizes fairness and thoroughly explores important users during the sampling process, allowing for a better accuracy-fairness trade-off. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, which demonstrate the effectiveness of both FAST and FAST+ frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: