The synthesis demonstrates enhanced ionic conductivity in NASICON-type solid electrolytes, suggesting optimal sintering parameters for Li-ion applications.
NASICON-type Li1+XFeXTi2-X(PO4)3 (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.4) solid electrolytes for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries were synthesized using a sol–gel method. This study investigated the impact of substituting Fe3+ (0.645 Å), a trivalent cation, for Ti4+ (0.605 Å) on ionic conductivity. Li1+XFeXTi2-X(PO4)3 samples, subjected to various sintering temperatures, were characterized using TG-DTA, XRD with Rietveld refinement, XPS, FE-SEM, and AC impedance to evaluate composition, crystal structure, fracture surface morphology, densification, and ionic conductivity. XRD analysis confirmed the formation of single-crystalline NASICON-type Li1+XFeXTi2-X(PO4)3 at all sintering temperatures. However, impurities in the secondary phase emerged owing to the high sintering temperature, above 1000 °C, and increased Fe content. Sintered density increased with the densification of Li1+XFeXTi2-X(PO4)3, as evidenced by FE-SEM observations of sharper edges of larger quasi-cubic grains at elevated sintering temperatures. At 1000 °C, with Fe content exceeding 0.4, grain coarsening resulted in additional grain boundaries and internal cracks, thereby reducing the sintered density. Li1.3Fe0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 sintered at 900 °C exhibited the highest density among the other conditions and achieved the maximum total ionic conductivity of 1.51 × 10−4 S/cm at room temperature, with the lowest activation energy for Li ion transport at 0.37 eV. In contrast, Li1.4Fe0.4Ti1.6(PO4)3 sintered at 1000 °C demonstrated reduced ionic conductivity owing to increased complex impedance associated with secondary phases and grain crack formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: