Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This observational analysis examines physical and physiological impacts of small-sided games on players, suggesting improved performance outcomes.
Purpose: The study investigated between the physical and physiological effects of differently designed sided games in soccer; total of 28 male soccer players with an average age of 18.2±0.77 years participated in the study. Material and Methods: Two different study groups took part in this study: consisted of Smal Side (SSG) 35 × 25 m and Long Side (LSG) 60 × 45 m fields. Endurance training was performed 2 days a week for 8 weeks. Results: When the post test results between the groups were analyzed, not significant main effect y balance test score F (1, 24) = 34.32, p = 0.060, ηp2= 0.007. The statistically significant effect respectively; sprint F (1.24) = 19.60, p = < .001, ηp2= 0.450, IFT; F (1.24) = 44.68, p = < .001, ηp2= 0.65, T-test F(1.24) = 16.72, p = < .001, ηp2 = 0.411 and RPE F(1.24) = 7.32, p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.234 values. Conclusion: The recommended that coaches should implement SSG exercises 2 times a week in their routine soccer exercise programmes to improve physical and physiological performance during the season.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murat Tutar (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: