This review explores group process use and its ethical implications in resident advisor candidate selection.
This paper revisits the effectiveness and ethics of an enduring feature of Resident Advisor (RA) candidate review and selection: group process. Drawing on the limited existing literature and our own professional experience, we present a review of current forms of group process, including potential problems and benefits. The ethics of the current practice of group process along with questions for its future are also considered. Regardless of how departments may use group process in RA applicant review and selection, we posit a fresh examination, guided by ethics and purpose, is overdue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: