This analysis demonstrates properties of essential and closed submodules in intuitionistic l-fuzzy modules, suggesting deeper structural insights.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity and M be an R-module. An intuitionistic L-fuzzy submodule (ILFSM) C of an intuitionistic L-fuzzy module A of R-module M, is called an intuitionistic L-fuzzy essential submodule in A, if C ∩ B ≠ χ{θ} for any non-trivial ILFSM B of A. In this case we say that A is an essential extension of C. Also, if C has no proper essential extension in A, then C is called an intuitionistic L-fuzzy closed submodule in A. Further, for ILFSMs B, C of A, C is called complement of B in A if C is maximal with the property that B ∩ C = χ{θ}. We study these mentioned notations which are generalization of the notions of essential submodule, closed submodule and complement of a submodule in the intuitionistic L-fuzzy module theory. We prove many basic properties of both these concepts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: