Prospective study compares augmented reality navigation to C-arm guidance for spinal injections, suggesting similar efficacy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Augmented reality (AR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) offer 3-dimensional (3D) visualization to enhance procedural accuracy and reduce fluoroscopy use in spinal interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of an AR-HMD navigation system for facet joint injections in comparison with the conventional C-arm-guided approach. METHODS: In this prospective controlled study, 5 cadavers underwent computed tomography to generate 3D spine models. An AR application developed in Unity with Vuforia Engine was deployed on the HoloLens 2 headset for navigation. A neurosurgeon performed 216 facet joint needle placements (108 AR-assisted, 108 C-arm-guided). Postprocedural computed tomography validated placement accuracy. An independent blinded radiologist evaluated all placements. RESULTS: Of 216 total needle placements, 74 (34.3%) were rated excellent, 109 (50.5%) acceptable, and 33 (15.3%) failed. No significant difference in overall success rates was found between AR-guided and C-arm-guided approaches, χ 2 (2, 216) = 2.96, P = .23. However, lumbar region placements showed significantly higher success in the AR group compared with the control group, χ 2 (2, 120) = 7.09, P = .03. CONCLUSION: AR-guided facet joint needle placement demonstrates accuracy and safety comparable to conventional C-arm-guided techniques. The AR-HMD system enhances 3D anatomic visualization and may reduce radiation exposure for healthcare personnel. These findings support further exploration of AR technology in spinal interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adıyaman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: