PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025JAMA Surgery2 citations

Long-Term Risk of Mesh Infection Requiring Removal After Elective Ventral Hernia Repair

View Full Paper
AEAnne P. EhlersJSJoshua SinamoRHRyan Howard

Key Points

  • Mesh removal occurred in 2.2% of patients, indicating a low risk for mesh infection after ventral hernia repair.
  • Higher incidences of mesh removal were observed in females and those with 30-day wound complications, highlighting risk factors.
  • A retrospective cohort study analyzed Medicare claims data over 10 years, providing extensive insight into long-term outcomes.
  • Continued use of mesh for ventral hernia repair is supported despite a low overall risk of removal due to infections.

Abstract

Importance Hundreds of thousands of people have mesh placed for ventral hernia repair every year, but the long-term risks of clinically significant mesh infection requiring mesh removal remain unknown. Objective To examine the risk of clinically significant mesh infection requiring removal after ventral hernia repair. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 100% Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021, for adults aged 18 years or older who underwent elective inpatient open ventral hernia repair with mesh. Data were analyzed from October 21, 2024, to May 2, 2025. Exposure Mesh placed at the time of ventral hernia repair. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was mesh removal up to 10 years after the index operation. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify mesh removal, which was used as a surrogate measure for a clinically significant mesh infection. Secondary outcomes included the association between 30-day wound complications and subsequent mesh removal. Results Of 59 453 people (35 209 female 59.2%), 1330 (2.2%) underwent mesh removal with a median time to mesh removal of 8 months (238 days; 25th to 75th percentile = 49 to 757 days = 2 to 25 months). People who underwent mesh removal were more often female than people who did not undergo mesh removal (63.0% 838 vs 59.1% 34 371; P = .005), more often underwent enterectomy (3.5% 46 vs 2.3% 1342; P = .008), and more often experienced a wound complication within 30 days (23.6% 314 vs 6.6% 3825; P lt; .001). The cumulative hazard percentage of mesh removal for a patient with wound complications at 10-year follow-up was 7.94 (95% CI, 7.03-8.84) compared with 2.48 (95% CI, 2.31-2.64) for patients without. Most mesh removals occurred within the first 5 years after surgery. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that the risk of mesh removal is low overall, even for people who experience a wound complication. These findings support the broad use of mesh for people undergoing elective open ventral hernia repair.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ehlers et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de5d9c83cbc991d0a20464https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3915
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper