October 2, 2025

The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of National Strategies for Digital Sovereignty

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

OPOksana ProkopyshynStepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies Lviv НТНаталія ТрушкінаAnatolii Pidhornyi Institute of Power Machines and Systems

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This comparative analysis reveals distinct models of digital sovereignty in the US, EU, China, and Russia, suggesting implications for global cybersecurity.

Key Points

Digital sovereignty has evolved from network security to a tool for geopolitical power and influence.
The analysis identifies three distinct models: market-driven (US), regulation-as-power (EU), and state-centric (China/Russia).
These approaches lead to a fragmented splinternet, marked by contested governance and competing regulatory frameworks.
A new framework proposes digital sovereignty as a tool for exercising state power in a multipolar digital world order.

Cite This Study

Prokopyshyn et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de5da283cbc991d0a206ca https://doi.org/10.54658/ps.28153324.2025.12.2.pp.59-71

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This comparative analysis reveals distinct models of digital sovereignty in the US, EU, China, and Russia, suggesting implications for global cybersecurity.

The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of National Strategies for Digital Sovereignty

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The Geopolitics of Cybersecurity: A Comparative Analysis of National Strategies for Digital Sovereignty

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider