Analysis finds that phenotypic variations, rather than hemodynamic shear, affect remodeling in aortic valve disease.
Aortic valve disease (AVD) is asymmetric. Various clinical reports indicate that the non-coronary cusp (NCC) is disproportionally burdened by pathological remodeling like inflammation, fibrosis, and calcification. This has long been attributed to differences in hemodynamic load that arise from the presence, or lack thereof, of coronary ostia in respective sinuses. However, there is little empirical evidence to suggest that differences in hemodynamic shear alone are enough to drive the pathological remodeling observed. C57BL/6J mice exhibit high variance in right coronary ostium (RCO) positioning with respect to the right coronary cusp (RCC). Through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of a mouse aortic valve (AoV) during end diastolic loading, we show negligible differences in wall shear stress (WSS) between a high RCO on the RCC and no ostium on the NCC. Also, though CFD analyses depict at least an order of magnitude difference in WSS through physiologically relevant ostia positions within the sinuses, ostium position does not correlate with calcification burden in a CKD mouse model of calcific AVD. Cusp dependent extracellular matrix (ECM) abundance analysis reveals asymmetric collagen and elastin content in healthy adult mice, but this does not follow the same trend as pathological remodeling. Instead, asymmetric abundance of elastin (P=0.034) and collagen (P=0.018) was mainly driven by increased ECM proteins in the left coronary cusp (LCC) with no differences in leaflet thickness. Cusp dependent transcriptomic (spatial and bulk RNA sequencing) analyses reveal asymmetric phenotypic profiles between the three cusps in healthy adult mice. Of note, genes associated with vascular smooth muscle contraction and modulators of AoV remodeling were upregulated in the NCC and downregulated in both the RCC and LCC. Together, these data suggest that differences in shear from coronary ostia are not sufficient to explain asymmetric onset of calcific AVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaparro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: