This review demonstrates a stepwise method for knee alignment analysis in arthritic patients, highlighting its impact on arthroplasty outcomes.
This review presents a standardized, stepwise method for biplanar radiographic analysis of knee alignment, integrating both coronal and sagittal measurements for use in arthritic and non-arthritic knees. It critically compares leading classification systems, including the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) and the functional knee phenotype classifications. While CPAK provides a simplified 2D coronal model, the functional phenotype system offers a more granular, 3D approach that includes segmental deformities and has recently been expanded to incorporate laxity parameters. Sagittal plane parameters – including posterior tibial slope and femoral component flexion/extension – are essential for comprehensive alignment assessment. These factors influence implant positioning, knee kinematics, and postoperative function. The review outlines preferred measurement techniques, highlighting the value of long-leg weight-bearing radiographs and discussing the limitations and variability of 2D versus 3D imaging approaches. Incorporating both alignment and soft tissue behavior provides a more individualized approach to total knee arthroplasty planning and may lead to improved outcomes by better replicating native knee biomechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiyama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: