Theft is rampant in society. The current state of society makes it very possible for people to find shortcuts by stealing. From print and electronic media, it is shown that theft crimes often occur with various types which are motivated by unmet living needs, and the perpetrators do not close from their own families. Based on the position of the case and decision number 65 / Pid.B / 2024 / Pn.Tbt above, there are legal regulations against perpetrators of criminal acts of theft in the family that have been tried by the Panel of Judges, namely Article 367 of the Criminal Code, Application of Article 367 of the Criminal Code in cases of theft in the family committed by the defendant against the victim which is a complaint offense, in this case the judge applies the elements of Article 367, namely, Whoever takes goods that are entirely or belong to someone else, with the intention of being owned unlawfully, and is carried out by blood relatives or by marriage.
Irawan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: