Case study reports yield decreases with intensified tillage in winter wheat and soybean, suggesting balancing practices for soil health.
The scope of this research was to quantify the mid-term impact of different soil tillage on carbon/nitrogen agronomical key context under optimal growing conditions of the European moderate continental climate. A large-scale on-farm experiment was established in winter wheat/soybean two-crop long-term cultivation without fertilization on fertile Luvic Chernozem. Four treatments were conducted: (T1) ‘Deep Loosening’ with tillage depth of 50 cm, (T2) ‘Plowing’ to 30 cm, (T3) ‘Strip-Till’ with tillage depth of 20 cm, and (T4) ‘No-Till’; the tillage frequency at T1 and T2 was reduced and applied to soybean only, therefore, once per 2 years during the trial period 2020/21–2024/25. Unlike the crop yield, which decreased with tillage intensity decreasing (21.38 > 19.30 > 18.88 > 18.62 t/ha in dry matter cumulatively; T2 > T3 > T1 > T4), the carbon/nitrogen key agronomical parameters either increased (root nodules count/weight: thus confirmed convergent, occasionally reverse indicators; soil compaction: penetrometric resistance) or differed in varying patterns and extent (soil chemical indicators). In fertile Chernozem soils, tillage and indicators have different importance within the nexus studied; plowing still gives the most stable yields. To improve nitrogen fixing, farmers’ practices need to balance yield vs. soil health, including eliminating soil compaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tóth et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: