The experiment shows differences in crystallization behavior of troglitazone isomers, indicating solution-state interactions impact selectivity.
The control of crystal form in chiral active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is a critical challenge in pharmaceutical development, as differences in solid-state structure can significantly influence physical properties and manufacturing performance. Troglitazone, a molecule with two chiral centers, exists as four stereoisomers (RR, SS, RS, SR) that crystallize as two enantiomeric pairs: RR/SS and RS/SR. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between solution-state molecular interactions and crystallization behavior of these diastereomeric pairs. Antisolvent crystallization experiments were conducted for both mixed solutions containing all four isomers and solutions of individual pairs. Crystallization kinetics were monitored by HPLC, and the resulting solids were characterized by PXRD, DSC, TG, and microscopic observation. Nucleation induction times were determined over a range of supersaturation levels. To probe intermolecular interactions in solution, NOESY and targeted NOE NMR experiments were performed, and the results were compared with crystallographic data. The RS/SR crystals(H-form) consistently exhibited shorter induction times and faster crystallization rates than the RR/SS crystals (L-form), even under conditions where RR/SS solutions were more supersaturated. In mixed solutions, H-form crystallized preferentially, with L-form either remaining in solution or being incorporated into H-form crystals as a solid solution. NOESY and NOE analyses revealed intermolecular proximities between protons that are distant in the molecular structure, indicating the presence of ordered aggregates in solution. These aggregates were more structurally compatible with the H-form than with the L-form crystal lattice, as supported by crystallographic distance analysis. The results demonstrate that differences in nucleation kinetics between troglitazone diastereomers are closely linked to solution-state molecular arrangements. Understanding these relationships provides a molecular-level basis for the rational design of selective crystallization processes for chiral APIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuura et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: