Observational analysis reveals significant improvements in operative time and complications in lung cancer patients, indicating effective learning with uniportal techniques.
Background: Uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy has improved postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. Thus, thoracic surgeons are increasingly required to learn this new approach. Methods: We evaluate the path of a single surgeon switching from triportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy to the uniportal, using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, in a single center to assess the learning curve, enrolling 107 uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomies consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis detected how many uniportal video-thoracoscopies occur to obtain changes in mean operation time, among all procedures consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis identified the cut-off at the 67th procedure; this value was used to divide all patients into two groups: group A (first 67 patients, early phase) and group B (40 patients, experienced phase). Then, we analyze the perioperative outcomes between the two groups. Results: Gender characteristics of the two groups were statistically similar. Median operative time decreased significantly after the early phase [188 min (IQR: 151–236) vs. 170.5 (IQR: 134–202) (p-value = 0.02)], respectively. Similarly, during the second phase, the conversions rate decreased: [10 (15%) (group A) vs. 1 (2%) (group B) (p-value = 0.04)], as did the postoperative complications [28 cases (42%) vs. 9 cases (22%) (p-value = 0.04)] and the length of stay [6 days (IQR 5–9.5) vs. 5 days (IQR 4–8) (p-value = 0.04)], giving evidence of skills acquired in the second phase. Conclusions: CUSUM analysis identified 67 uniportal lobectomies, after which operative time, conversion rate, and perioperative complications significantly decreased; the moving average analysis further supports a progressive reduction in operative time. Despite prior multiportal video-thoracoscopic experience, switching to uniportal video-thoracoscopy requires a distinct learning process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerretani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: