Indoor environmental quality in offices, comprising thermal, acoustic, lighting, and air quality domains, is known to influence human comfort, yet the relative importance of their sub-factors—particularly in severe cold regions—remains unclear. This study addresses this gap by integrating objective (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation, CRITIC) and subjective (Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP) weighting methods, supported by field measurements and questionnaire surveys in open-plan offices in three provinces in northeastern China. Cluster analysis categorized acoustic sub-factors into outdoor traffic, outdoor entertainment, people conversation, burst sound, and people movement. Results show that temperature is the dominant thermal comfort driver (39.7% CRITIC; 45.5% AHP), exceeding air velocity and humidity, which had nearly equal influence. Indoor sound exerted greater impact than outdoor sound, with people conversation ranked highest among indoor noise sources, and burst sound and movement showing similar but slightly lower weights. Natural light outweighed artificial light in importance (54.2% CRITIC; 61.0% AHP), while air freshness and pollution were nearly equally influential. Compared to CRITIC, AHP produced more dispersed weights, reflecting subjective bias toward pronounced differences. These findings provide a quantitative basis for prioritizing environmental design interventions—such as controlling indoor conversational noise, optimizing natural lighting, and stabilizing temperature—to enhance comfort in offices in severe cold regions.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.