Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population ageing has intensified demand for age-friendly housing, yet existing indoor environmental quality (IEQ) assessment schemes rely on expert-defined or fixed weights and rarely reflect older occupants’ priorities. From the perspective of person-environment fit in environmental gerontology, this study developed a weighted IEQ evaluation system for the residential satisfaction of older adults. Six indoor environmental factors were examined: ventilation, daylighting, indoor temperature, noise, CO₂ concentration and relative humidity. Data were collected in Zhuzhou, China, including 210 questionnaires (154 from older adults) and 35 semi-structured interviews, with both sources equally weighted. The integrated questionnaire–interview analysis yielded estimated weights of 20.50% for ventilation, 18.95% for daylighting, 17.64% for indoor temperature, 16.67% for noise, 15.19% for CO₂ concentration, and 11.05% for relative humidity. These estimates reflect sampled priorities, and the relative ordering of middle-ranked factors was interpreted as indicative. Combining these weights with elderly-specific thresholds, a four-indicator scoring system (air quality, daylighting, indoor temperature and noise) was applied to an age-friendly recreational building in Zhuzhou through simulation, identifying daylighting and thermal performance as improvement priorities. The study operationalizes person–environment fit at the dwelling scale and provides a user-oriented, context-specific reference for evaluating and prioritizing age-friendly residential retrofits in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: