Observational analysis documented neuromuscular impairment frequency and severity in VPS13A disease, indicating its underrecognized impact.
Objective VPS13A disease (chorea‐acanthocytosis) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder caused by biallelic variants in VPS13A, typically presenting with hyperkinetic movement disorders, while neuromuscular signs are often mild. The aim of the project was to investigate the frequency and severity of neuromuscular impairment in VPS13A disease. Methods We systematically assessed the neuromuscular involvement in six patients with VPS13A disease. Our evaluation included genetic and clinical data, blood tests, electrophysiological studies, muscle MRI, and tissue samples from muscle and nerve. Results Age at clinical onset was 14 to 38 years (median: 37.5). Age at onset of paresis was 27 to 29 years (median: 29). Initial symptoms included seizures (5/6), hyperkinesia (2/6), and muscle weakness (1/6). Neuromuscular signs ranged from hyporeflexia (5/6) to progressive muscle wasting (3/6). Nine VPS13A variants were detected, including a novel copy‐neutral inversion. Phosphocreatine kinase was elevated in all cases (498–12,420 U/L; median of highest values: 2230 U/L). Nerve conduction studies revealed sensorimotor axonal neuropathy. Electromyography showed chronic neurogenic changes with high amplitudes, polyphasic potentials, and reduced interference patterns (6/6). Muscle MRI displayed fatty atrophy, most prominently in the calves (5/5). Muscle histology indicated neurogenic and myopathic changes. Electron microscopy of mitochondria and respiratory chain analysis showed no specific pathological findings. Interpretation Our findings emphasize the underrecognized neuromuscular spectrum in VPS13A disease, ranging from subclinical signs to severe paresis and sometimes preceding the hyperkinesia that gave rise to the historical term of chorea‐acanthocytosis. A comprehensive understanding of the phenotype is crucial for early diagnosis and appropriate management of VPS13A disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buchberger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: