Assessment of Black Bone MRI predicts round window visibility during posterior tympanotomy, highlighting differences by age group.
Purpose Although computed tomography (CT) can predict round window (RW) visibility at posterior tympanotomy pre-operatively, there is a trend towards the application of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone for cochlear implant (CI) planning. This study assessed the potential of a novel “Black Bone” (BB) MRI sequence to determine RW visibility during posterior tympanotomy. Methods Patients underwent BB MRI as part of pre-operative CI planning. Two independent radiologists performed 5 landmark-based MRI measurements. RW visibility was recorded during posterior tympanotomy as > 50% or < 50% visibility. Patients with undefinable landmarks or absent surgical grading were excluded. Mann-Whitney U or t-tests compared MRI measurements to RW visibility whilst step wise logistic regression determined significant predictors. Results 86 patients (40 male; median 10.5 years) and 129 implanted ears (43 unilateral, 43 bilateral; 52 adult, 77 paediatric) were evaluated. There were 109/129 ears with > 50% and 20/129 ears with < 50% RW visibility. The external auditory canal (EAC) angle was increased in paediatric patients with > 50% RW visibility ( P = 0.033; AUROC 0.689; 73.4% sensitive, 69.2% specific with threshold 6.2 o ) with ICC = 0.598. The facial recess distance, facial nerve location, and modified RW niche angle were increased in adult patients with > 50% RW visibility but only modified RW niche angle was significant on stepwise regression ( P = 0.016; AUROC 0.805; 82.2% sensitive, 71.4% specific with threshold 17.95 o ) with ICC = 0.578. Conclusion The visibility of RW at posterior tympanotomy may be determined with pre-operative BB MRI. The optimal predictive measurements differ between adult and paediatric patients and there is superior performance in adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwok et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: