Analysis establishes quality markers for raw laver, utilizing biochemical profiling and market valuation.
Introduction Raw laver ( Pyropia spp.) quality assessment is largely subjective and lacks scientific standardization. Methods This study established objective quality markers by integrating biochemical profiling with market-based valuation. Twenty-two samples from Seocheon, South Korea (Jan -Mar 2024) were classified into high, medium, and low quality based on auction price and total free amino acid (TFAA) content. Proximate composition and amino acid profiles were determined using AOAC methods and HPLC. Multivariate models (PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA) were applied to identify key discriminants. Results The OPLS-DA model achieved excellent performance (R 2 X = 0.790, R 2 Y = 0.916, Q 2 = 0.911) and clear group separation. Alanine, glutamic acid, and aspartic acid were critical markers, with alanine showing the strongest correlation with TFAA (r = 0.93). The PLS-DA model achieved 100% classification accuracy in both training and test sets. Discussion These findings provide a robust scientific basis for raw laver quality grading, supporting transparent market practices and industrial standardization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: