PulseJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 2, 2025Public Administration IssuesOpen Access

Urban Environment Improvement: Assessment Methods

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AGAlīna GalkinaJPJuri Plusnin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Critical review highlights the limitations of existing urban assessment indices, suggesting a new method focusing on well-being.

Key Points

  • The proposed methodology measures improvements in urban environment effectively, emphasizing local engagement.
  • Two existing indices lack comparability, with one focusing on urban environment quality and the other on quality of life.
  • This research introduces an intuitive composite index grounded in the dual concept of well-being, enabling clear evaluations.
  • The new approach aims to simplify assessments for local governments in small towns and settlements, enhancing community involvement.

Cite This Study

Galkina et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de6f3a83cbc991d0a22666https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-3-95-120
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap2017 · 496 citations
  2. 2The role of rankings in growing city competition2010 · 260 citations