Retrospective cohort analysis compares buprenorphine and full agonist opioids for pain relief in critically ill patients, indicating potential benefits for respiratory safety.
Background: Buprenorphine is an opioid that has recently gained interest for acute pain management in post-operative patients. It has theoretical advantages due to its unique mechanism and favorable adverse effect profile. Currently, no studies have evaluated intravenous buprenorphine for acute pain management in a critically ill medical patient population. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the use of intravenous buprenorphine with or without a full agonist IV opioid vs a full agonist IV opioid alone for acute pain in non-ventilated, non-surgical critically ill patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was completed of patients who received IV buprenorphine or full-agonist opioids while admitted to the medical intensive care unit at an academic medical center and community hospital. Results: The median DVPRS difference in the buprenorphine group compared to the control group was 5 vs 6. The non-inferiority t-test showed buprenorphine was not significantly non-inferior with mean DVPRS score at day 3 for the buprenorphine group was 5.02 and the control group was 5.07 ( P = 0.85). Respiratory depression within 7 days occurred less in the buprenorphine group (20.6% vs 42.9%, P = 0.004). Oversedation occurred less in the buprenorphine group (27% vs 46.8%, P = 0.01. The ICU LOS was longer in the buprenorphine group (8 vs 5 days, P = 0.01). The median daily OME on day 1 was less in the buprenorphine group (29 vs 42.5, P = 0.03). Conclusion: Intravenous buprenorphine may be a comparable alternative to full agonist intravenous opioids for pain control in the medical intensive care unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satterfield et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: