Discussion highlights the importance of open access information for conditions, challenging claims of specialized content limiting public engagement.
I noted, on Twitter, how pleased I was to discover that there was good information available online about my current condition. I want, here though, to offer a few words to the ridiculous arguments that are sometimes brought against open access. Namely, that there isn't a public for this material because it is specialized in both its wording and its content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: