Usage of git demonstrates improved version control in writing, highlighting its benefits for authors.
My two spheres of interest -- difficult works of English literature and computer programming (OK, scholarly communications and publishing, also. OK, there are lots more spheres of interest) -- only intersect occasionally. However, in recent days I have been toying with the idea of using git to version control my writing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: