October 2, 2025Open Access

The undervalued book collection and peer review

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Discussion

Observational analysis on peer review in edited collections, suggesting a need to reassess their value in academic dissemination.

The argument that essays in book collections lack peer review is challenged, as they undergo significant scrutiny.
Many scholars believe the REF undervalues book collections, affecting their acceptance in academia.
Edited collections may be reviewed more rigorously than some journal articles, contradicting common perceptions.
Dissemination modes impact academic value, and reassessing edited collections could improve scholarly communication.

Martin Paul Eve (2012) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

October 2, 2025Open Access

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Observational analysis on peer review in edited collections, suggesting a need to reassess their value in academic dissemination.

The argument that essays in book collections lack peer review is challenged, as they undergo significant scrutiny.
Many scholars believe the REF undervalues book collections, affecting their acceptance in academia.
Edited collections may be reviewed more rigorously than some journal articles, contradicting common perceptions.
Dissemination modes impact academic value, and reassessing edited collections could improve scholarly communication.

Martin Paul Eve (2012) studied this question.

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark