Analysis reveals that holding copyright may limit author rights in journal articles, suggesting benefits of licensing.
I've just had through the request to sign a copyright form for a forthcoming article in a Taylor and Francis journal and duly read through their material on copyright. Taylor and Francis explicitly state that: All fair and good. However, I wondered, given the extensive schedule of rights that they provide back to an author, what the benefit would be of holding on to the copyright of the piece.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: