Commentary addresses concerns over history journals equating CC-BY with plagiarism, indicating a misunderstanding of licensing.
I'm quoted with a few choice words this week in the Times Higher Education for their piece on the already infamous statement by a coalition of editors of history journals, who equate CC-BY with plagiarism. Here's the quotation: Here's the full text from which that was excerpted: There's a further few thoughts that have struck me since then. Plagiarism is not a legal term that has any bearing upon licensing;
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: