Discussion highlights concerns and potential benefits of the new REF staff circumstances rules.
I am quoted in [today's Research Fortnight](https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/news/uk/ref-2014/2019/12/REF-staff-circumstances-rules-criticised.html) on the new REF staff/individual circumstances under the heading 'REF staff circumstances rules criticised'. The quote used only gives a selection of the views that I supplied and omits the bits where I say why the new situation might be better (that's fine -- it's journalism and I was not
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin Paul Eve (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: