Retrospective analysis shows reduced vasopressor requirement in sepsis patients, suggesting potential benefits of haemoadsorption.
Aim: The rationale for combining various extracorporeal blood purification techniques to improve patient outcomes is currently being discussed extensively. The combined use of CytoSorb®, with high capacity for cytokine removal, and Oxiris®, which adsorbs endotoxins and smaller cytokines, may enhance the efficacy of blood purification in sepsis. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of simultaneous use of CytoSorb® and Oxiris® in 12 consecutive critically ill patients with COVID-19, who developed secondary bacterial sepsis and persistent hemodynamic instability. Results: Most of the patients (n = 8) treated with combination of the Oxiris® and CytoSorb® had a significant decrease in vasopressor requirement. Pre- and post-haemoadsorption data were analysed in 9 patients, who completed a 24 h course of treatment. A significant decrease in mean SOFA score (16.3 ± 1.7 to 15.0 ± 2.0 points), median vasopressor requirement (0.56 ± 0.29 to 0.11 ± 0.21 µg/kg/min), median procalcitonin levels (6.5 ± 27.0 to 1.6 ± 6.0 ng/mL), median IL-6 levels (584 ± 6279 to 107 ± 571 pg/mL), and mean leucocyte count (36.0 ± 20.6 to 20.9 ± 10.1 × 103/mL) was observed. Furthermore, there was significant increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio (108 ± 30 to 185 ± 55). We did not observe any device-associated adverse events or technical problems. A 27.5% drop in platelet count (269 ± 116 to 195 ± 82 × 106/mL) and an 11.8% drop in haemoglobin level (10.7 ± 2.9 to 9.5 ± 2.0 g/dL) was noted. Conclusions: Our data suggests that combined use of Oxiris® and CytoSorb® for simultaneous cytokine and endotoxin removal in patients with underlying viral infection may be a promising therapeutic option. Our findings may serve as a guide for future research and provide directions for further development in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wrzosek et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: