Observational analysis reveals carcass traits and chemical composition in different turkey varieties, highlighting significant differences in performance.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate productive, reproductive performance, carcass characteristics, chemical composition of meat and serum lipid profile of different turkey varieties. In the present study, a total of 200 turkeys from White, Black, Bronze and Red varieties were reared on slated floor under intensive production system from 0 to 72 weeks of age. Turkey poults were reared with commercial feed (Starter diet: ME 2950 kcal/kg, CP 23% for initial 8 weeks; Grower diet: ME 2950 kcal/kg, CP 16% for 8-16 weeks and Layer diet: ME 2900 kcal/kg, CP 17% for 17 weeks- end of laying period). There’s no significant (p>0.05) difference found in 0, 4,8,12 and 20 weeks old turkey except 16 weeks. Quality analysis was performed on breast and thigh meat, as well as on abdominal fat of the studied Turkeys. Carcass weight and dressing percentage, breast and thigh of Bronze variety was significantly (p<0.0001) highest. Measured abdominal fat was found to be non-significant (P>0.05). Furthermore, there is no significant difference found in crude protein among breast and thigh meat of different varieties. The ether extract and crude fiber of breast and thigh meat of White turkey was significantly (p<0.0001) lower than other varieties. Ash content of breast meat of White variety was significantly (p<0.01) greater than other varieties. In case of egg related parameters, Bronze variety of turkey had the better age at first laying, egg fertility percentage significantly and numerically better hen day egg production whereas Red variety had the better hatchability and egg weight than others. Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL were significantly (p<0.0001) higher in Red Turkey and lower in Bronze turkey. It can be concluded that Bronze variety of turkey might be comparatively better than other varieties. Bang. J. Livs. Res. Vol. 30 (1&2), 2023: P. 36-47
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarker et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: