This analysis reveals differences in microstructure and mechanical properties of inconel 625 made by wire arc and wire electron beam additive manufacturing.
The present paper compares the microstructure and mechanical properties of Inconel 625 alloy samples produced by using wire-arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and wire electron beam additive manufacturing (WEBAM). The obtained wall-shaped samples did not contain any macroscopic defects in the form of cracks, delaminations and geometry distortions. The WAAM-built “wall” exhibits finer dendritic structures (WAAM—10–16 μm; WEBAM—20–25 μm). Also, the WAAM-built one is characterized by the more homogeneous-sized distribution of microstructure components. In both cases, the material is represented by the γ-phase, with large precipitates of MC-type carbides in the interdendritic spaces. Additionally, the sample obtained using the WAAM contained aluminum oxide. It was found that the intrinsic periodic heat treatment is not sufficient for the formation of the γ″-phase, and it is necessary to perform a subsequent long-term aging. However, the overall mechanical properties of both samples show similar levels of yield stress and ultimate tensile strength, and demonstrate the same degree of anisotropy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurianov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: