Essay reveals judicial challenges to term limits in Bolivia and Nicaragua, suggesting risks for democracy.
Latin American presidential term limits are oftentimes in peril. Today, term limits, which have historically acted as an important check on authoritarianism, face a new threat: judicial assaults based upon human-rights considerations purportedly tied to international human-rights treaties. This essay outlines four cases of term-limit backsliding, in Bolivia, El Salvador, Honduras, and Nicaragua, their use of these novel arguments, and the consequences for each country. The essay concludes with an overview of relevant legal rulings and the ramifications for future would-be presidential overstayers and for democracy in Latin America.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gedan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: