Cross-sectional survey reveals job satisfaction mediates the impact of optimism and hope on well-being among university lecturers, suggesting important pathways for enhancing lecturer welfare.
Abstract Background Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study examines how future-oriented personal resources from psychological capital (optimism and hope) relate to university lecturers' well-being and whether their job satisfaction functions as a conditional resource linking these personal resources to the outcomes Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to 224 Vietnamese university lecturers. Participants completed validated measures of psychological capital’s components (optimism, hope, self-efficacy, resilience), job satisfaction, and overall well-being. Path analysis with 5000 resampling bootstraps was used to test direct and mediating relationships. Results Job satisfaction showed a strong positive association with well-being (β = 0.296, p < 0.001). Optimism predicted both job satisfaction (β = 0.193, p = .018) and well-being (β = 0.175, p = 0.011), yielding a significant indirect effect on well-being through job satisfaction (β = 0.057, p = 0.031). Hope had a significant direct effect on well-being (β = 0.233, p = 0.001) but was not predicted to job satisfaction. Self-efficacy and resilience were not significant predictors of either outcome. Conclusions Findings clarify two pathways in accordance with COR among university lecturers, including a context-appraisal pathway in which optimism translates into greater job satisfaction and, subsequently, higher well-being, and a goal-navigation pathway in which hope directly enhances well-being independent of job evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: