Assessment highlights human-elephant conflict affects local communities, indicating a need for conservation policies.
Understanding people’s attitudes towards elephants (Elephas maximus) is crucial for formulating appropriate policies for species conservation and mitigating human-elephant conflict (HEC). Therefore, this study aimed to assess attitudes and perceptions toward elephant conservation in Udayapur District, eastern Nepal. Based on information from key informants (n = 10) and focus group discussions (n = 3), a total of 97 households were selected for a semi-structured questionnaire survey to collect data on human-elephant incidents. Half of the respondents (50%) identified crop damage as the primary issue caused by wild elephants, and nearly half (46%) reported an increase in HEC over the past five years (2016–2020). The majority (60%) claimed habitat encroachment as a major cause of HEC in the study area. Approximately 46% of respondents use fire-related techniques to mitigate such conflicts. Moreover, more than half of the respondents (62%) showed a low willingness to conserve elephants, which was significantly influenced by their education level [χ2 (2) = 9.43, p < 0.001] and occupation [χ2 (2) = 7.81, p < 0.05]. The findings of this study will help develop management interventions that benefit communities and elephants through effective HEC mitigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhandari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: