In vitro analysis of T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with inborn errors of immunity reveals significant disparities, suggesting improved vaccination strategies.
Background The immunogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has been reported as highly variable in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Objective The aim of this study was to study memory CD4 + T-cell-mediated responses against the Spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 along with CMV peptides in a large IEI group composed of mostly predominantly antibody-deficient (PAD) patients. Patients and methods In vitro antigen-specific T-cell anti-S and -CMV responses after two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were assessed in peripheral blood from 114 patients with IEI and 38 healthcare healthy controls (HCHC). Stimulation index (SI) based on the percentages of CD4 + T lymphocytes with effector memory phenotype CD45RA − CD27 − (TEM) was quantified by flow cytometry. Results Patients with IEI overall, as well as the two main groups of PAD [i.e., common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and isotype or functional antibody deficiencies (IOFD)], showed frequencies of responder individuals and median SI against SARS-CoV-2 comparable to HCHC. However, those IEI and CVID subgroups positive for anti-CMV T-cell immunity showed a significantly reduced response (SI) against S-peptides when compared to their IEI and CVID counterparts who were anti-CMV TEM negative. This effect of CMV stratification is independent of age in our patient group. Conclusion CMV latency negatively impacted the CD4 + TEM population’s functionality regarding COVID-19 vaccination in patients with CVID. Our results in patients with IEI and previous similar findings in healthy populations highlight the fact that when assessing immune-specific responses, the inclusion of CMV monitoring is suitable, is worthwhile, and may potentially be extended to vaccinations against different pathogens to prevent human disease more accurately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alba-Cano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: