Exploratory study compares mission china 2030 with back-to-jerusalem, highlighting shifts in approach and partnerships.
This article presents an exploratory study of one of the most significant emerging mission movements in contemporary China, Mission China 2030 ( MC 2030), with a particular focus on its continuity and divergence from the Back-to-Jerusalem ( BTJ ) movement. Through a structured analysis, this study examines the historical origins, theological foundations, and strategic approaches of MC2030 , highlighting its efforts to mobilize the Chinese church for global evangelism. While BTJ emphasized an indigenous and eschatologically charged vision, MC2030 reflects a pragmatic shift, embracing strategic planning and fostering international partnerships, particularly through its connection to the Lausanne Movement. Ultimately, the study underscores the movement’s eclectic nature, integrating elements from BTJ , the Lausanne Movement, and the legacy of Western missionaries, while navigating the challenges of government restrictions and the evolving global mission context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tianji Ma (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: