Pilot experiment shows 1:1 tutoring improves math achievement compared to 3:1 ratios in middle school students, indicating challenges in small-group settings.
Budget constraints and limited tutor supply have caused many K–12 school districts to pivot from individual tutoring toward small-group tutoring to expand access to personalized instruction. We conduct a pilot experiment to contrast the effects of student–tutor ratios on middle school students’ math achievement and growth during an online tutoring program. We leverage a novel feature of the program where tutors often taught individual and small-group tutoring sessions, allowing them to directly compare their experiences across these settings. Both experimental estimates and tutor survey responses provide suggestive evidence that 1:1 tutoring is more effective than 3:1 tutoring in an online setting. Tutoring small groups online presents additional challenges for personalizing instruction, developing relationships, fostering participation, and managing student behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraft et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: