Historical analysis reveals Ban Gu's defense of Mencius against Sima Qian's critique on sovereign power, indicating a deeper perspective.
Building upon Sima Qian’s work, Ban Gu directly identified Mencius as a disciple of Zisi and established the Mencius as comprising eleven chapters. Ban Gu explicitly opposed Sima Qian’s evaluation of Mencius as “impractical and remote from reality,” arguing instead that Mencius possessed a longer-term perspective than his contemporaries. He also elaborated on Mencius’s doctrine that sovereign power is “conferred by Heaven” and selectively handled historical materials and passages from the Mencius.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhi Gao (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: