October 2, 2025Deleted JournalOpen Access

State, Constitution, and Identity of Power: A Socio-Political Analysis of the Debate on the Minimum Age Requirement for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The ruling reveals an expansion of judicial interpretation in Indonesia, raising concerns about legitimacy in political processes.
Constitutional Court Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 alters age requirements for candidates, suggesting potential influence of political interests.
A socio-legal research approach provides insights into the dynamics of power and constitutional authority in Indonesian governance.
Recommendations include clearer judicial limitations and enhanced oversight mechanisms to protect the integrity of democratic processes.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

This analysis examines judicial interpretations regarding the minimum age for presidential candidates, suggesting implications for constitutional law and democratic integrity.

Cite This Study

Samudro et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68de84bb5b556a9128e1ba26 https://doi.org/10.30598/baileofisipvol3iss1pp67-82

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis examines judicial interpretations regarding the minimum age for presidential candidates, suggesting implications for constitutional law and democratic integrity.

State, Constitution, and Identity of Power: A Socio-Political Analysis of the Debate on the Minimum Age Requirement for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

State, Constitution, and Identity of Power: A Socio-Political Analysis of the Debate on the Minimum Age Requirement for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider