This cross-sectional study reveals smoking intensity and duration are linked to sensorineural hearing loss in adult males, indicating potential health risks.
Background: This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the effect of smoking intensity (pack-years) and duration on hearing thresholds and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) occurrence among adult Iraqi males. Methods: 100 males (50 smokers, 50 non-smokers), aged 18-45 years, were recruited at Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq. Data collected from September 2024 to January 2025 included demographics, smoking history (pack-years), and nicotine dependence (Fagerström Test). Participants underwent otoscopic and physical examination, tympanometry, and pure-tone audiometry, measuring hearing thresholds at low frequencies (500-2000 Hz) and high frequencies (3000-8000 Hz). Logistic regression was used to assess smoking’s association with SNHL. Results: SNHL was detected in 16% of smokers and none of the non-smokers (p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that smoking duration (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.04-1.45; p = 0.011) and pack-years (AOR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.07-1.88; p = 0.021) independently predicted SNHL, after adjusting for age and occupation. Smokers had poorer hearing thresholds, especially at high frequencies (3000-8000 Hz). A smoking duration ≥24.5 years predicted SNHL with 87.5% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity, though this cutoff is exploratory due to the small number of SNHL cases (n=8). Fagerström Test results showed no significant association between nicotine dependence and SNHL. Conclusion: Smoking duration and intensity are associated with elevated hearing thresholds and high-frequency SNHL in adult males. The findings highlight smoking’s harmful auditory effects, but the small sample size and cross-sectional design limit causality. Generalizability may be limited as only male participants were included. Further longitudinal studies including both genders are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radhi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: