This article critiques Eurocentric models in global literary studies, suggesting more inclusive approaches and emphasizing cultural transfer.
This article examines the emergence of global literary studies as a developing field in response to growing academic interest in transnational literary circulation, cultural transfer, and interdisciplinary, decolonial methodologies. It proposes a conceptual framework based on five key notions — space, scale, time, connectivity, and agency — to guide research across literature, translation, and film. By tracing the historical trajectories of related terms and traditions such as world literature, cultural transfer, and transnational history, the article critiques Eurocentric and binary models and advocates for more inclusive, plural, and dynamic understandings of literary systems. Emphasizing the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches, digital humanities, and data-driven methods, it also calls for institutional decentralization to foreground global and non-Western perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roig-Sanz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: