Analysis compares established and emerging colorectal cancer screening strategies, highlighting their benefit-to-burden ratios.
Journal Article Corrected proof RE: Evaluating benefit-to-burden ratios of the established and emerging colorectal cancer screening strategies Get access Derek W Ebner, MD, Derek W Ebner, MD Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States Corresponding author: Derek W. Ebner, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States ([email protected]). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0089-2507 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Chris Estes, MPH, Chris Estes, MPH Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing - original draft Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2367-6535 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Paul J Limburg, MD Paul J Limburg, MD Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing - original draft Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, United States https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2428-5675 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, djaf266, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf266 Published: 01 October 2025 Article history Received: 05 August 2025 Revision received: 15 August 2025 Accepted: 21 August 2025 Published: 01 October 2025
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: