Prospective cohort study reveals lower arthritis risk in higher social economic status groups, suggesting targeted prevention strategies.
Arthritis represents a major global health burden, with social economic status (SES) emerging as a critical determinant. However, longitudinal evidence from Asian populations remains limited. This prospective cohort study used China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data, including 4,469 arthritis-free participants aged ≥ 45 years from baseline (2011) through 2018. SES was assessed using composite scores combining education and household wealth, categorized into four groups. New-onset arthritis was determined by self-reported physician diagnosis. Covariates included demographics, lifestyle factors, anthropometrics, and comorbidities. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated cumulative incidence with log-rank tests. Subgroup analyses examined effect modification by gender and age. During 7-year follow-up, 1,324 participants (29.6%) developed arthritis. In fully adjusted models, compared with low SES, upper-middle SES demonstrated reduced risk in both logistic (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55–0.82, P < 0.001) and Cox regression (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60–0.84, P < 0.001). High SES showed greater protection (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.14-1.00; HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18–1.08). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed cumulative incidence decreased across SES groups: 34.5% (low), 31.1% (low-middle), 23.5% (upper-middle), and 14.3% (high SES; log-rank P < 0.0001). Effects remained consistent across gender and age subgroups. Higher SES was independently associated with reduced arthritis risk among Chinese middle-aged and elderly adults, demonstrating a clear dose-response relationship. These findings support targeted prevention strategies for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: